Effective prompting is less about finding a magic phrase and more about designing a clear, testable workflow. This course focuses on practical techniques you can apply across tools and workplace tasks, while keeping human responsibility for the final output.
Throughout the day, you will move from a baseline prompt to increasingly structured approaches, test outputs against supplied source material and finish by developing a reusable prompt for a task relevant to your own role.
Understand how prompts shape outputs
Start with the foundations: how prompts, context and model variability influence results. You will complete a baseline task and consider responsible tool use, including the handling of sensitive information.
Write clearer, more effective prompts
Learn to specify the objective, audience, context, source material, constraints and output format. You will explore when roles are useful, when the model should ask for clarification and how small changes can improve an otherwise vague request.
Build reusable workflows
Compare zero shot and few shot prompting, use examples effectively and separate instructions from source text. You will also break complex tasks into stages with review points rather than expecting one prompt to do everything.
Ground and check outputs
Work from supplied documents, ask for source references and flag missing evidence. You will practise checking fabricated facts, calculations, omissions and bias, and learn why instructions contained inside source documents should be treated cautiously.
Test and refine prompts systematically
Compare prompt versions against the same source pack and evaluation rubric. This makes improvement measurable and helps you understand whether a change has actually improved accuracy, relevance, completeness or instruction compliance.
Apply prompt engineering to a real workplace task
Choose a task such as an options appraisal, project plan, policy briefing or learning resource. Define success criteria, build and refine the prompt, test it with two input examples and record the human checks that remain necessary.
Learn through peer review
Review outputs for accuracy, relevance, completeness, instruction compliance and responsible use. Compare the final result with your baseline task, explain what changed and identify what still requires human verification.